![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| |
|
Why PowerPlay multipoint is so much better than using an MCU for multipoint video conferencing:Using an MCU ONLY provides QCIF Video Resolution
in a Continuous Presence Video conference - Multipoint conferencing
with an MCU/bridge works by having all the endpoints send their video
and audio to the bridge. The bridge then mixes all the video into one
composite CIF image, and sends that back out to the endpoints. Thus the
endpoint gets one video image of CIF size, that contains the rehashed,
reencoded images from all the other endpoints. The end result is a composited
stream of four participants at only QCIF resolution per video image.
MCUs do not support multipoint calls at high bit
rates - Even leading manufacturers can only support up to 384kbps
in a 4-way conference.
Using an MCU increases Latency - It also
means all the video has to be decoded and re-encoded a second time at
the bridge, thus doubling the latency and reducing the video quality.
Limited Resource - It also means that you
are at the mercy of the bridge's available resources when you want to
place a call. i.e. you must have an endpoint with a bridge for every multipoint
conference that you wish to have. Or you need a centralized MCU that supports
the total number of conference you wish to have at any given moment.
Very difficult to conduct Ad-hoc conferences -
With MCU-based conferences, the endpoints CANNOT ad-hoc invite new
people into the conference or hang them up. You can only do this by going
to the MCU itself, and controlling it, with it's own web-page interface
or application program.
Transcoding with an MCU adds Latency and degrades
video quality - Transcoding means you have to decode video,
and then re-encode it before transmission in order to allow endpoints
to use different codecs. This increases delay and lowers video quality.
|
|
|
|Home| |Login| |Support| |About BNI| |Products| |Network Services| |Resellers| |Success Stories| All
contents copyright © 2000-2003 BNI Solutions LLC
|